No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
The Summer’s biggest news story in e-book rights, and probably in book rights in general, was the feud and subsequent settlement between Random House and powerful agent Andrew Wylie. Robert Scott Lawrence revisited the case in a blog entry over the weekend, with the added context of a 2001 case in which Random House sued Rosetta Books over a similar complaint.
Of the Rosetta case, Lawrence writes:
“In denying Random House’s request for an injunction, the district court ascribed to this generally accepted definition of the word “book,” and found that the grant of e-book rights was not contemplated by contracts which preceded the invention of e-books themselves.
The court of appeal subsequently upheld the lower court’s decision, but noted in passing that “there is some appeal to Random House’s argument that an ‘ebook’ – a digital book that can be read on a computer screen or an electronic device . . . is simply a ‘form’ of a book, and therefore within the coverage of Random House’s licenses.”
And he concludes, unsurprisingly:
“the most important question — still remains unanswered: Who owns the e-book rights to books published before the advent of e-books?
Right now the answer appears to be ‘Who knows?'”
"*" indicates required fields